Monday, May 31, 2010

4G wireless: It’s fast, but outstripped by hype

By PETER SVENSSON, AP Technology Writer Sun May 30, 1:01 pm ET

NEW YORK – Cell phone companies are about to barrage consumers with advertising for the next advance in wireless network technology: “4G” access. The companies are promising faster speeds and the thrill of being the first on the block to use a new acronym.

But there’s less to 4G than meets the eye, and there’s little reason for people to scramble for it, at least for the next few years.

Sprint Nextel Corp. is the first carrier to beat the drum for fourth-generation wireless technology. It’s releasing its first 4G phone, the EVO, this week.

In the fall, Verizon Wireless will be firing up its 4G network in 25 to 30 cities, and probably will make a big deal of that. A smaller provider, MetroPCS Communications Inc., is scheduled to introduce its first 4G phone around the same time.

So what is 4G?

Broadly speaking, it’s a new way to use the airwaves, designed from the start for the transmission of data rather than phone calls. To do that, it borrows aspects of the latest generation of Wi-Fi, the short-range wireless technology.

For consumers, 4G means, in the ideal case, faster access to data. For instance, streaming video might work better, with less stuttering and higher resolution. Videoconferencing is difficult on 3G and might work better on 4G. Multiplayer video games may benefit too.

Other than that, it’s difficult to point to completely new uses for 4G phones — things they can do that 3Gphones can’t.

Instead, the upgrade to 4G is more likely to enhance the things you can already do with 3G, said Matt Carter, president of Sprint’s 4G division.

“View it as the difference between watching regular TV and high-definition TV,” Carter said. “Once you’ve experienced high-definition TV it’s hard to go back to standard TV. It’s the same sort of thing here.”

So the improvement from 3G to 4G is not as dramatic as the step from 2G to 3G, which for the first time made real Web browsing, video and music downloads practical on phones. The introduction of 3G started in earnest about five years ago, but it isn’t complete — AT&T Inc. and T-Mobile USA still have little rural 3G coverage, for instance.

There’s an important caveat to the claim that 4G will be faster, as well. It will definitely be faster than the 3Gnetworks of Sprint and Verizon Wireless — about four times faster, initially. But the other two national carriers, AT&T and T-Mobile, are upgrading their 3G networks to offer data-transfer speeds that will actually be higher than the speeds 4G networks will reach this year or next.

That means that rather than focusing on real speeds, Sprint and Verizon will try to frame their marketing around the “4G” term, said Dan Hays, who focuses on telecommunications at management consulting firm PRTM.

“It’s a terrible story from a consumer standpoint, because it’s tremendously confusing,” he said.

AT&T and T-Mobile are able to upgrade their 3G networks because they use a different 3G technology than Verizon and Sprint, which have maxed out their 3G speeds. Taking the step to 4G is natural for Verizon and Sprint, especially because they have new chunks of the radio spectrum that they want to take advantage of.

The fact that Verizon Wireless and Sprint are adding fresh spectrum may be more important than the fact that they are using it for 4G service. No matter if used for 4G or 3G, new spectrum means the companies can accommodate more data-hungry devices such as smart phones.

AT&T’s network is already staggering under data congestion caused by the iPhone in New York and San Francisco. The carrier has made relieving the congestion a top priority this year, and its 3G upgrades are part of that process. (As an aside, there is a lot of talk of a coming “iPhone 4G.” Apple Inc. will most likely release the fourth generation of the iPhone for AT&T’s network this summer, but it’s virtually certain that it will not be able to use a 4G wireless network. It likely won’t be called the “iPhone 4G” either.)

There’s another, more subtle benefit to 4G. While it’s not always faster than the best 3G when it comes to helping you download a big file in less time, it is definitely faster in the sense that it takes less time to initiate the flow of data to you. What that means is that 4G is faster for quick back-and-forth communications. You wouldn’t notice this when surfing the Web or doing e-mail: We’re talking delays of 0.03 second rather than 0.15 second. But it could mean that 4G will work better for multiplayer gaming, where split-second timing is important. Even phone calls could benefit from shorter audio delays.

Sprint and Verizon are taking different routes in 4G. Sprint owns a majority of Clearwire Corp., which is building a network using WiMax technology. Once seen as very promising, WiMax looks set to be a niche technology, and WiMax devices like the Sprint EVO phone won’t be able to use networks built using the dominant 4G standard, called LTE, for Long Term Evolution. Verizon and MetroPCS plan to use LTE, as does AT&T, starting next year. T-Mobile says it will probably use LTE eventually. Even Sprint hasn’t ruled out using LTE eventually, because the technology has huge momentum.

In five years or so, many phones are likely to have 4G capabilities, but they’ll complement it with 3G. Rather than a sudden revolution, consumers are likely to experience a gradual transition to the new technology, with increasing speeds. But for now, 4G is no magic bullet.

“It’s an important thing for the industry,” said Bill Davidson, senior vice president of marketing and investor relations at wireless technology developer Qualcomm Inc. “It’s absolutely needed. … But I just think some of this has gotten a bit ahead of itself in terms of expectations for consumers.”

Via:http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100530/ap_on_hi_te/us_tec4g_hype;_ylt=Aq0Zqmptuhpx_TrfyaCQlGgjtBAF;_ylu=X3oDMTJldWpkZjNhBGFzc2V0A2FwLzIwMTAwNTMwL3VzX3RlYzRnX2h5cGUEY3BvcwMxB

Sunday, May 30, 2010

Era of anonymous prepaid cell phones may end

Prepaid cell phones with plans that can be purchased with cash and sans identification have long been the communication medium of choice for criminals and such, and for obvious reasons. Without a known cell phone number to tie a crook to, getting a wiretap becomes almost impossible, and such villains can generally operate with complete impunity, gabbing away in plain sight with no one able to listen in.

And we’re not just talking about crack dealers. The convenience and anonymity of prepaid plans has reportedly even made them popular with Wall Street types engaging in insider trading activity. Naturally, terrorism is a major concern, too. The FBI says it found that the recent Times Square bomb scare was arranged through the use of a prepaid cell phone, as well.

Frustrated with this loophole, now lawmakers are looking to make prepaid cell phones considerably less anonymous, AFP reports. A bipartisan bill announced this week in the Senate would require prepaid cell phone buyers to provide ID before a purchase.

This is unlikely to sit well with many legitimate users of prepaid phones, who often don’t have the money for a regular, subscription-based, post-paid plan. Anonymity is prized by many prepaid users, whether they are using the phone to evade an abusive partner, to blow the whistle on dangerous working conditions, or simply to avoid telemarketers and political pollsters.

But Ars Technica notes that for many governments, the criminal risks of anonymous phone usage outweigh such concerns: Collecting registration date from prepaid customers is already required by at least nine of the 24 countries that belong to the Organization for Cooperation and Economic Development. And several states have laws requiring papers when you buy a cell phone of any kind.

Will this legislation go federal? With few people stepping up to complain about the proposal, it certainly seems likely.

— Christopher Null is a technology writer for Yahoo! News.

Via:http://news.yahoo.com/s/ytech_wguy/20100528/tc_ytech_wguy/ytech_wguy_tc2314;_ylt=Au_EhSxtW89m.ec8pJ0EocIjtBAF;_ylu=X3oDMTJ1b2l0bXBzBGFzc2V0A3l0ZWNoX3dndXkvMjAxMDA1MjgveXRlY2hfd2d1eV90Yz

US sees 78 bank failures in 2010

By Agencies

With five more US banks biting the dust this week, a whopping 78 entities have folded up their businesses so far this year.

Mirroring the financial woes faced by the American banking industry, an average of 15 banks are going bankrupt every month.

Recently, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), which insures deposits at over 8,000 American banks warned of more failures in the coming months.

Authorities shut down five entities on May 28. They are Bank of Florida — Southwest; Bank of Florida – Southeast; Bank of Florida– Tampa Bay, Sun West Bank and Granite Community Bank.

These failures are expected to cost the FDIC as much as USD 317 million.

The three Florida-based banks were owned by Bank of Florida Corporation.

In the first three months of 2010, the number of ‘problem’ banks climbed to 775, the highest in nearly 17 years. The same stood at just 702 at the end of 2009.

This month alone, 14 banks have gone out of business.

The count of collapses are anticipated to rise in the wake of high unemployment levels, which is resulting in increased defaults at banks.

Last year, a whopping 140 banks in the US went belly up.

“There will be more failures, to be sure. The banking system still has many problems to work through and we cannot ignore the possibility of more financial market volatility,” FDIC chairperson Sheila C Bair said recently.

Via: http://in.biz.yahoo.com/100530/50/bavoyh.html

Mukesh Ambani in talks to buy JM Financial – source

MUMBAI (Reuters) – Billionaire Mukesh Ambani is in talks to buy a majority stake in JM Financial Asset Management that oversees $1.8 billion in assets, a source with direct knowledge of the situation said on Monday.

The talks are in early stages and the terms of the deal have not been finalised yet, said the source, who could not be identified as he was not authorised to speak to the media.

The source said the deal value could be 8 percent of the assets under management at the unit of financial services firm JM Financial, backing a report in the Mint newspaper.

JM Financial Asset Management denied the selloff plans.

“There is no truth in this. JM Financial mutual fund forms an important part in the JM Financial Group portfolio and we remain focused and committed towards growing this business,” JM Financial Asset Management CEO Bhanu Katoch told Reuters.

For StreetSight data on JM Financial’s equity holdings,http://r.reuters.com/dup37k

Energy major Reliance Industries (RELIANCE.NS : 1042.7 +6.05), the flagship of Mukesh Ambani, declined to comment.

Ambani had ended a non-compete pact with younger brother Anil earlier this month, which frees Mukesh to invest where ever he sees opportunity, with financial services, power and infrastructure on his target list.

($1=46.3 rupees)

(Reporting by Pratish Narayanan; additional reporting by Nishant Kumar; Editing by Ranjit Gangadharan)

(For more business news on Reuters India click http://in.reuters.com)

Via:http://in.biz.yahoo.com/100531/137/bavoza.html

“Quit Facebook Day” Only Affects 2% of U.S. Users

By: David Murphy
05.30.2010

Have you heard of “Quit Facebook Day?” If not, you’re not alone. In response to the recent Facebook privacy issues, a batch of users founded this celebration of-sorts (not on Facebook, obviously) in hopes that thousands more would join their commitment to deactivate their Facebook accounts come May 31. Well, that’s tomorrow, and according to a new batch of research from Vision Critical, “Quit Facebook Day” appears to be a bust.

It’s unclear whether user apathy or Facebook’s recent batch of privacy modifications is the root of the failed attempt. Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg unveiled a new batch of simpler privacy options for Facebook in a press conference last week as well as alterations to the kind of information Facebook shares by default with entities that aren’t a user’s actual friend, amongst other changes.

A variety of institutions praised Facebook’s new stance on privacy–users too. According to Vision Critical, 61 percent of 699 surveyed users said that they were happy with Facebook’s response to the various privacy concerns surrounding its operations, although 81 percent maintain that they’re still going to treat Facebook a little more carefully in regards to what information they use or share on its network.

As for “Quit Facebook Day,” only 11 percent of surveyed users had even heard of the event at the time of Vision Critical’s survey. While 22 percent of that 11 percent vowed to continue forward in deleting their accounts, the number–once extrapolated–indicates that only two percent of Facebook’s entire U.S. user base plans to go forward with account deletion. Quit Facebook Day’s official site has 25,157 “confirmed” Facebook quitters as of this article’s writing.

“These findings suggest that while Facebook users are becoming increasingly concerned about their privacy and the type of information they are sharing with others, the apocalyptic predictions of mass churn from Facebook are highly overrated and likely fueled by a small but vocal group of highly engaged Facebook consumers,” says Matt Kleinschmit, Senior Vice President of Media for Vision Critical.

“Too many users are just too vested in the service to delete their account and dismantle a social network they have cultivated over time,” he adds.

PCMag recently ran its own analysis of the top Facebook privacy concerns compared up against Zuckerberg’s proposed changes. For five of the six privacy areas that editors demanded Facebook change, Zuckerberg’s announcements were found to only adequately cover two. Check out our original analysis here and our mash-up of Zuckerberg’s promises against Facebook’s critical privacy weaknesses here.

Via:http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2364338,00.asp

Top Ten Most Cited Patent Cases 2007-2010

In the common law tradition, virtually every written opinion from the Federal Circuit cites to prior precedent. I looked at the past few years of Federal Circuit decision to discover the most cited patent cases.

The following list is ranked based on citations found in Federal Circuit patent decisions that were decided January 1, 2007 – May 26, 2010. The ranking is a combined score of both (1) the number of times a case was cited and (2) the depth-of-analysis associated with the citation. I excluded non-patent cases from the list.

  1. Phillips v. AWH Corp., 415 F.3d 1303 (Fed.Cir. 2005).
  2. Cybor Corp. v. FAS Technologies, Inc., 138 F.3d 1448 (Fed.Cir. 1998).
  3. KSR Intern. Co. v. Teleflex Inc., 127 S.Ct. 1727 (2007).
  4. Markman v. Westview Instruments, Inc., 52 F.3d 967 (Fed.Cir. 1995).
  5. Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas City, 86 S.Ct. 684 (1966).
  6. Vitronics Corp. v. Conceptronic, Inc., 90 F.3d 1576 (Fed.Cir. 1996).
  7. In re Calmar, Inc., 854 F.2d 461 (Fed.Cir. 1988).
  8. Warner-Jenkinson Co., Inc. v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co., 117 S.Ct. 1040 (1997).
  9. MedImmune, Inc. v. Genentech, Inc., 127 S.Ct. 764 (2007).
  10. Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp., 108 S.Ct. 2166 (1988).
  11. Kingsdown Medical Consultants, Ltd. v. Hollister Inc., 863 F.2d 867 (Fed.Cir. 1988).
  12. Rite-Hite Corp. v. Kelley Co., Inc., 56 F.3d 1538 (Fed.Cir. 1995).
  13. In re Seagate Technology, LLC, 497 F.3d 1360 (Fed.Cir. 2007).

Posted on May 30, 2010 at 03:49 PM | Permalink

Via:http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2010/05/top-ten-most-cited-patent-cases-2007-2010.html

Nissan Motor to outsource

Mahindra Satyam is understood to have won a USD 40 million contract from Japanese automobile major Nissan Motor Co Ltd.According to sources, the deal valued at USD 40 million involves outsourcing new technology for application maintenance and operation services of Nissan. The contract is for three years till 2013. There is also an additional extension period of two years. The latest contract with the Japanese automaker is in addition to an existing one with Nissan America.Sources said the deal will be for three year from now and can be extended further two years.

However, a Mahindra Satyam (formerly Satyam Computer Services) spokespersons refused to comment on the deal and its size.Satyams chief executive CP Gurnani had observed a few months ago that the company had not fully gotten over its troubles and would require another couple of years to recover completely. The embattled company, once Indias fourth largest IT exporter, is in the process of restating its accounts for the last few years. It is expected to submit the details by June 30.

In 2006, Satyam Computer signed a five-year deal to maintain, support and enhance the application portfolio for Nissan North America.

The deal included an application portfolio spanning multiple business functions, plants, locations and business units. Satyam also manages all its mission critical business application in its key North American market.

Via:http://www.offshoringtimes.com/Pages/2010/offshore_news2964.html